Save Abu Ghraib!
Don't Let Bush Destroy Another Piece of Iraqi History!
Turn it into a Museum
Honoring the Victims of Saddam & Bush
Protestors outside Abu
Ghraib during Rummy's surprise visit after The Photos exploded into the
world's consciousness By Dr. Susan Block
So, Bush’s
big, "compassionate" solution to the systemic problem of amped-up American
torture and the tragic folly of his War on Iraq is to destroy Abu Ghraib
Prison. Of course, he probably should have done that a long
time ago.
While
he let
the museums, hospitals, libraries and schools be burned and pillaged, he
preserved Saddam’s notorious house of torture and death and turned it into
his own notorious house of torture and death, not to mention a film
studio for his blockbuster production of Bush's
POW Porn.
In his
speech at the Army War College in Carlisle, Pennsylvania., America's Great
Pretzel Swallower had make-up caked on his chin to conceal his latest war
injury (he was "wounded in action"
when
he fell off his bike while vacationing over the weekend in
Crawford, Texas). But he couldn't conceal his usual smirk nor the shame
he has brought upon his country.
Bush
offered
no exit strategy for bringing 138,000 American soldiers home, no word
on the lack of WMDs in Iraq (remember the WMDs, the
ostensible
reason
for the invasion?), no admission of his numerous costly and murderous
mistakes, no news on Osama (remember him?) and no more apologies to Iraqis
for the torture, let alone all the killing and
maiming.
But he
did show that he is acutely aware of the extreme public relations
crisis that The Photos of Americans gaily torturing
Iraqi
prisoners
poses
for his
occupation and reelection. His answer is to destroy Abu Ghraib "as
a fitting symbol of Iraq's new beginning." Indeed, when our Executioner-in-Chief
doesn’t know what to do with something, he destroys it.
Bush
wants to destroy Abu Ghraib because it’s the closest thing he can
come up with to making a bonfire out of all The Photos. I call The Photos
"Bush’s POW Porn," since he created it all with his inherently
corrupt policies. Bush didn't "liberate" Iraq, but he did liberate the
CIA and Military Intelligence from virtually any limitations on torture.
Bush
dreams of incinerating the evidence of his torture fetish in a blaze of
censorship. Of course, he can’t burn The Photos at Fahrenheit 451 or 911,
or at any temperature, because they’re digital. They're everywhere.
They document Bush's Rape
of Iraq. They have become one of the most ubiquitous,
highly scrutinized collections of pornography the world has
ever known.
Bush
can’t destroy The Photos any more than Lady MacBeth could get the blood
off her hands. But because most of The Photos were taken at Abu Ghraib,
he feels that destroying Abu Ghraib is "symbolically" destroying the torture.
His "plan" is to create a big happy bonfire of destruction (maybe with
a little looting on the side) to burn away
the awful
images of The Photos in our minds. It matters
little that American torture of this kind has been documented in Guantanamo,
Afghanistan and many Iraqi detention centers other than Abu Ghraib. Bush
wants Iraqis, Americans and everybody else
to believe that the sickness in The Photos is just a nasty mold in the
woodwork
of Saddam's old dungeon, which will be gone just as soon as we can send
in the demolition derby.
He'll
get some Iraqis to give the thumbs-up and dance around the flames of Abu
Ghraib, like he got some to cheer at the toppling
of
Saddam's
statue (though obviously, he can't use Ahmed Chalabi's guys for this photo-op).
Like the toppling, it will be cathartic for a few moments, but he will
be destroying a piece of Iraqi history. The prisoners won't benefit, of
course; they'll just be moved to a nice "modern maximum-security prison"
(just like a good portion of America's 2.5 million prisoners live in here
at home) where their tortures can continue, probably with a lot more secrecy.
Maybe
Bush also wants to destroy the old penal complex for other, less "symbolic"
reasons, like because evidence is there, evidence of American as well
as Saddam’s tortures, rapes,
murders and various crimes against humanity.
Probably there’s some evidence that would give
us even greater shocks than we’ve already gotten. Perhaps even evidence
of Nick Berg’s and other mysterious atrocities.
Whatever
his reasons, George W. Bush should not be allowed to destroy Abu Ghraib.
Even if there’s no evidence there, the building doesn’t belong to
him, and it isn’t his to destroy, whatever it’s a “symbol” of. He should
give Abu Ghraib back, like the rest of their country, to the Iraqi people.
He should give it back with a nice wad of cash (which I wish we could take
out of the Carlyle Group’s or Halliburton's hide, but I guess it will have
to come out of US taxpayers), so Iraqis can turn the place into a museum,
along
the
lines
of a slavery
or holocaust museum, a Rape
of Iraq museum, or whatever they want to turn
it into, a mosque, a schoolhouse or a swing house.. It’s
theirs.
Bush,
Dick, Rummy, Condi and Wolfie had no right to rape Iraq in the first place.
But now that they have, they have no right to destroy the
evidence. Turn
Abu Ghraib into a museum, dedicated to the concept of “Never Again!” and
honoring the prisoners who died and were tortured there. Make it a tribute
to their humanity, and to their families who waited so
patiently, so filled with love and hope, outside
the concertina
wire.
© May
24, 2004, Dr.
Susan Block
For reprint rights, please contact rox@blockbooks.com
Dr. Susan Block is a sex educator, cultural commentator, host of The Dr.
Susan Block Show and author of The 10 Commandments of Pleasure.
Visit her website at http://www.drsusanblock.com
Send
all hate mail, love letters, commentary, questions and confessions to her
at liberties@blockbooks.com.
Read "Save
Abu Ghraib" in
READ
|